Model topology is divided into two compartments, cell programming and performance testing. The cell programming compartment is split into history and pre-treatment. History ( History I or H1: E.coli grown for 18hrs in LB flask, transferred to fresh LB flask after that. History II or H2: E.coli grown for 18hrs in LB flask, transferred to fresh LB flask for 45 min. From this flask, 0.1O.D./ml transferred to rich medium and grown for 4 hours. From this,0.1O.D./ml transferred to fresh rich medium. History III or H3: E.coli grown for 18hrs in LB flask, transferred to fresh LB flask for 45 min. From this flask, 0.1O.D./ml transferred to starvation medium and grown for 4 hours. From this,0.1O.D./ml transferred to fresh starvation medium. Pre-treatment (Pre-treatment 1(T1): 2.5g glucose/litre 5mM NH4Cl. Pre-treatment 2 (T2): 2.5g glucose/litre 0.25mM NH4Cl. Pre-treatment 3 (T3): - 0.25g glucose/litre 5mmM NH4Cl. Pre-treatment 4 (T4): 0.25g glucose/litre 0.25mM NH4Cl). Each pre-treatment given for 2.5 hours.The culture nomenclature indicates the adaptive path followed, for example, H1T1 indicates the culture has encountered history I (H1) and then transferred to pre-treatment 1 (T1).RNA was extracted for selected combinations. Performance testing : Performance testing describes the type of analysis done which is the growth pattern study onto three substrates, glucose, succinate and pyruvate. This performance testing revealed specific history-pretreatment combinations to be better suited for growth on certain substrate and some not suited for growth. The samples were harvested for RNA isolation at peak growth points and named worst_glucose, best_glucose,worst_succinate, best_succinate, worst_pyruvate and best_pyruvate according to the growth shown after testing all 12 history-pretreatment combinations. The differences in physiology were studied in details using microarray analysis of 13 samples including 3 history samples, 4 pre-treatment samples and 6 samples at performance testing level. RNA extraction was done using Qiagen RNeasy minikit (Germany). Standard Affymetrix protocol was followed for hybridization on Affymetrix E. coli Genome 2.0 Array.
No associated publication
No sample metadata fields
View SamplesEscherichia coli culture was subjected to two different types of nutritional scenarios, abundant carbon/ nitrogen sources and scarce carbon/nitrogen medium. Study revealed that scarce medium adapted culture were more tolerant to hydrogen peroxide than abundant medium.
No associated publication
No sample metadata fields
View SamplesOver activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) by TCDD results ampng other phenotypes in severe thymic atrophy accompanied by immunosuppression. The link between thymic atrophy, skewed thymocyte differntiation and immunosuppression is still not fully resolved. This study investigates the TCDD elicted exprssion changes in the ET, cortical thymus epithelial cell line.
Promoter analysis of TCDD-inducible genes in a thymic epithelial cell line indicates the potential for cell-specific transcription factor crosstalk in the AhR response.
Treatment, Time
View SamplesCD4+ T cells from 8-12 week female mice were isolated from wt and AhR-/- mice 24h after injection of 10g/kg TCDD or solvent control.
Transcriptional signatures of immune cells in aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-proficient and AHR-deficient mice.
Sex, Treatment
View SamplesOver-activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by TCDD in mice leads among other phenotypes to a severe thymic atrophy accompanied by immunosuppression. TCDD causes a block in thymocyte maturation and a preferential emigration of immature CD4-CD8- DN thymocytes (recent thymic emigrants) into the periphery. As part of this study gene expression profiles from DN thymocytes and thymic emigrants were generated from TCDD and solvent control mice
Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in thymocyte emigration in vivo.
Specimen part, Treatment
View SamplesEffect of an immunosupressive dose of TCDD, a ligand for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, on the gene expression profile of fetal DN thymocytes and thymic emigrants
Transcriptional signatures of immune cells in aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-proficient and AHR-deficient mice.
Specimen part, Treatment
View Samples8-12 week, female C57BL/6 mice were injected with 10 g/kg TCDD or solvent control. CD8+ T cells from spleen were FACS purified and submitted to transcription profiling
Transcriptional signatures of immune cells in aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-proficient and AHR-deficient mice.
Sex, Treatment
View SamplesEffect of the over activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor on gene expression of spleen derived dendritic cells.
Transcriptional signatures of immune cells in aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-proficient and AHR-deficient mice.
Sex, Treatment
View SamplesDrugMatrix is a comprehensive rat toxicogenomics database and analysis tool developed to facilitate the integration of toxicogenomics into hazard assessment. Using the whole genome and a diverse set of compounds allows a comprehensive view of most pharmacological and toxicological questions and is applicable to other situations such as disease and development.
Genomic models of short-term exposure accurately predict long-term chemical carcinogenicity and identify putative mechanisms of action.
Sex, Specimen part, Compound, Time
View SamplesDrugMatrix is a comprehensive rat toxicogenomics database and analysis tool developed to facilitate the integration of toxicogenomics into hazard assessment. Using the whole genome and a diverse set of compounds allows a comprehensive view of most pharmacological and toxicological questions and is applicable to other situations such as disease and development.
Genomic models of short-term exposure accurately predict long-term chemical carcinogenicity and identify putative mechanisms of action.
Specimen part, Compound, Time
View Samples